Modern tools — genetic testing, high-resolution imaging — let us identify thousands of conditions with remarkable precision. But there's a fair question underneath the progress: is our drive to put a name on every symptom sometimes making us sicker? Neurologist Dr. Suzanne O'Sullivan argues, in her book The Age of Diagnosis, that medicine has an over-diagnosis problem.

What over-diagnosis is

Over-diagnosis means correctly identifying a condition that would never have caused symptoms or harm if it had gone undetected. It's different from misdiagnosis (a wrong diagnosis) or a false positive (a harmless abnormal result). A classic example is imaging that finds a tiny, slow-growing cancer that would never have progressed — yet leads to stressful, risky treatment.

Why it happens

  • A human wish for certainty — we want a clear label, even when a condition's boundaries are genuinely fuzzy.
  • Clinicians' fear of missing something, amplified by liability pressure.
  • Ever-more-sensitive technology that flags minor findings we can't always interpret.
  • Systemic incentives that broaden disease definitions over time.

The real harms

Over-diagnosis isn't harmless. It can bring psychological stress, unnecessary treatments (with their own side effects and complications), stigma and identity effects — especially in children — and a drain on resources that could go to people with urgent needs.

The case for 'slow medicine'

The alternative isn't to stop testing — it's to test and label more thoughtfully: build a real doctor–patient relationship, use watchful waiting for mild or uncertain findings, share decisions honestly, and re-examine screening that doesn't clearly improve outcomes. O'Sullivan is not anti-progress; her point is that innovation should be paired with humility about uncertainty.

What you can do

  • Ask what a test or screening will change — the benefits and the risks.
  • Discuss watchful waiting for mild or unclear conditions.
  • Be open to uncertainty; not every symptom needs an immediate name.
  • Get a second opinion before aggressive treatment.
  • Consider a whole-person, integrative provider who treats the root cause.

Our ability to diagnose has, in some ways, outpaced our understanding of what a diagnosis means. Sometimes the healthiest choice is less testing and more conversation.

This article summarizes a published argument and is for general educational purposes only; it is not medical advice. Decisions about testing and treatment should be made with your own licensed provider.

Sources

  1. O'Sullivan S. The Age of Diagnosis (2025) — the source of the over-diagnosis argument and figures discussed.
  2. Welch HG et al. Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health.